Today on the occasion of the death anniversary of sh Mahatma Gandhi i remember him as a one of the greatest leaders of India but today 70 years ago a right wing Person whose name was Nathuram Godse assassinated him in Birla House of Delhi and after that he was hanged in the Jail in Ambala, Haryana and his brother gopal godse when got released in year 1964 he wrote a book on this whole matter and i have read that book in that book he made many points to prove that gandhi was a Anti Hindu but i want to ask this man nathuram and his followers that by assassinating mahatma gandhi he has violated the rules of bhagwat gita which clearly says that no person has right to murder another person and if anyone do that that murderer should be given death sentence by the law makers and further it also says that if murderer receives death sentence so in his next birth he will not face any issue in his next birth (Chapter 2 Sholka 11) and the Manu samhita another old Hindu text book also says that so those who stand against the death sentence of nathuram godse should thanks the judiciary of India who freed him from the sin of killing of that revolutionary who gave his entire life to the nation.
How can we say that Mahatma gandhi was anti Hindu in his book he said that nathuram fought against the caste system like there boss Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (President, Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha) but at the same time mahatma gandhi has also fought against the casteism and in 1932 he also signed poona pact with Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar by giving 19 percent reserved seats to SC/ST category candidates in the elections which was more than what british prime minister offered in separate electoral by this move he stopped the division with in Hinduism further he also said and i quote "I am Hindu not because i have taken birth in the house of Hindu I am Hindu because it is my belief that no one is big or small in that Hinduism in which i believes" he said it because Ch 4 Sloka 13 of Shreemad Bhagwat Gita which talks about the reality of varnashram and there equality.
The followers of nathuram says that gandhi din't wanted to stop partition the partrition but in the same book he admitted that mahatma gandhi offered PM post of Mohammad Ali Jinnah so that he can stop the demand of pakistan and if really that was the reason then i am sorry to say in Begnning of 1930's in gujarat VD Savarkar himself supported the idea of Two Nation Theory and many of there leaders were the members of their coaltion governments in Bengal and Sindh including Dr SP Mookerjee so why didn't you never said anything against them answer me why didn't you pointed them why this biasness & lias your idea for a Unity in india was good we support that but we don't support the crime what you did and further nathuram also criticised Mahatma Gandhi for supporting Khilafat Movement without knowing this fact that Arya Samaj Leader Lala Lajpat Rai who was also the member of there Akhil Bhartiya Hindu Mahasabha also supported khilafat movement why didn't he said anything why you assassinated mahatma gandhi and what is wrong if Indian Muslim considers Turkish king as there Khalifa we Hindus and Sikhs have great respect for nankana sahib and panja sahib which is now in Pakistan and many catheloic christains in India respects pop so are they wrong and supporting there feelings is a crime under which law of religion it is a crime like you want to show in your book
There were many baseless allegations you have made in your book which i will not believe can be right i know only one thing and that is talking about Secularism means a Pro Hindu Thing because "Ek kam saha vipra bodhvanti" (Truth is one Saints calls in a different way) and "Sarv Dharam Sambhav" (Respect of every religion) which Upnishads and vedas says that and further Bhagwat Gita says that "God lies in the hearts of every Individual not any particular person"
Gandhi was following that secularism which was in our genes he was not a Anti Hindu in my believes.
Comments
Post a Comment