Some days ago i was watching a video of a professor claiming that Hinduism is violent from roots and casteism is there in the roots
Well i don't know on what basis she is saying that but i want to quote some few points over here which talks contrary to what she says
1. In Hinduism u talked about caste system here i want to say that in Bhgawat Gita Ch. 4 Sloka 13 it is been said that "chātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛiṣhṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśhaḥ tasya kartāram api māṁ viddhyakartāram avyayam" which literally means I have created this four fold order ( 4 varnas / castes namely - Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras) according to the quality of work and what occupations has to do with the casteism this point proves that casteism was not in roots of Hinduism
2. Moreover many people criticises Mahabharata for the support of violence but i want to ask her and all those Intellectuals in Mahabharata Krishna taught Bhawat geeta and Bhagwat geeta 13.8–13.12 says very clearly that Non Violence, freedom from hypocrisy, Forgiveness etc.. all these I declare to be knowledge, and what is contrary to it, I call ignorance.
Well i don't know on what basis she is saying that but i want to quote some few points over here which talks contrary to what she says
1. In Hinduism u talked about caste system here i want to say that in Bhgawat Gita Ch. 4 Sloka 13 it is been said that "chātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛiṣhṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśhaḥ tasya kartāram api māṁ viddhyakartāram avyayam" which literally means I have created this four fold order ( 4 varnas / castes namely - Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas and Shudras) according to the quality of work and what occupations has to do with the casteism this point proves that casteism was not in roots of Hinduism
2. Moreover many people criticises Mahabharata for the support of violence but i want to ask her and all those Intellectuals in Mahabharata Krishna taught Bhawat geeta and Bhagwat geeta 13.8–13.12 says very clearly that Non Violence, freedom from hypocrisy, Forgiveness etc.. all these I declare to be knowledge, and what is contrary to it, I call ignorance.
So i don't understand that why that Prof... said that
Comments
Post a Comment